Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Galaxy A50s, getting a overall score of 95.4 against 86.6. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Galaxy A50s has Android 10. The Galaxy S22 Ultra body is much newer than the Galaxy A50s's, but it is incredibly heavier and thicker.
The Galaxy A50s and the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra count with very similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has more RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a little bigger display, a little bit better pixels number per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures better photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, because it has a lot higher video definition, a larger diafragm aperture, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors. The Galaxy A50s features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.