Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-10-20 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is better than the Galaxy S23, having an 86.6 score against 77.9. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Galaxy S23 has Android 13. Galaxy A50s is a notably heavier cellphone than Galaxy S23, but they are equally thin. Galaxy A50s has a slightly better screen than Galaxy S23, because although it has a little inferior count of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Galaxy A50s features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy S23, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S23, although it has a way smaller back camera sensor shooting way worse quality pictures and videos, a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images in low light environments and a back-facing camera with a lower 48 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S23, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S23, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.