Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-20 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25, with a score of 86.6 against 82.6. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a bit better screen density. The Galaxy S25 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs, a higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera and a way higher video definition.
The Galaxy A50s has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S25's battery duration is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A50s.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.