Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, with an 86.6 score against 77.8. The Galaxy A50s is a noticeably newer and thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it is also just a little heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy S5 Sport features a processor that's very similar to Galaxy A50s's processor, because although the Galaxy S5 Sport has lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A50s captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.