Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than the Galaxy XCover 5, with a general score of 86.6 against 78.1. The Samsung Galaxy A50s body is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy XCover 5, although it was released around 17 months before. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a larger display and more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A50s takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a lot better video definition. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.