Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 86.6 score against 77.6. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50s is incredibly older than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's construction is a lot lighter and a lot thinner.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A50s features a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a worse 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, it also counts with a much bigger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.