Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 86.6 score against 80.1. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy A50s is a much thinner and extremely lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both of them were released with only 6 months difference.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50s, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a way better resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy A50s has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.