Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. The Galaxy A50s body is notably lighter and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro, even though they were released with only a couple months difference. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy XCover Pro has a display that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A50s one, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a bit higher pixel amount per display inch.
Galaxy A50s has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a much bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy A50s features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has more internal storage. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.