Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A50s's 86.6 general score. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version. Galaxy Z Flip's body is just a little heavier but a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A50s, and both were released with only 4 months difference.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a quite bigger display, a little bit higher display density and a slightly better 1080 x 2636px resolution.
The Galaxy A50s features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.