Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A50s, getting a score of 92.3 against 86.6. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A50s, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a quite bigger screen, a little bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A50s features just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.