Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50s, having a 90.6 score against 86.6. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is newer and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy A50s's, but it's also a lot heavier. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A50s has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels quantity per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments and a back camera with way more MP.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.