Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-20 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is a little bit better than Xperia XZ Premium, with an 86.6 score against 79.8. Galaxy A50s's design is noticeably newer, lighter and just a little thinner than the Xperia XZ Premium. The Sony Xperia XZ Premium's processor is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A50s one, and although the Sony Xperia XZ Premium has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a much higher 2160 x 3840 resolution. The Galaxy A50s counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A50s captures much better photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a same size camera aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50s also has a bigger sensor taking better quality photos and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.