Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 3, with an 86.6 score against 86.6. Both devices we compare here use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features. The Galaxy A50s is a a lot lighter and much thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, even when both were only released with a few months difference.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 and Galaxy A50s both have quite similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low light situations.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.