Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Blasting black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A50s, getting a overall score of 90.1 against 86.6. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a way thicker and a lot heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system). Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a quite greater pixels density. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a back camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger sensor shooting better quality pictures and a bigger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a slightly better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has greater battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.