Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T's score of 82.2. The Samsung Galaxy A50s construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9T, even though both were released with only a few months difference. Both devices in this comparison have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T. Both of them have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the same screen pixels density and a display of the same size.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same sensor size, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same resolution camera in the back, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has much more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 9T and Samsung Galaxy A50s have really similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.