Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's 82.7 overall score. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS. The Galaxy A50s body is thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, although both of them were released with only 2 months difference.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A50s. Both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the same display pixels density and a screen of the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and Samsung Galaxy A50s count with incredibly similar batteries performance.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, a 0.5 inches sensor and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low-light environments and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.