Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Blue, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi A3, getting an 86.6 score against 79.2. Galaxy A50s is a just a bit thinner and just a little lighter phone than Xiaomi Mi A3, even when they were released with only a couple of months difference. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy A50s features a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit larger screen. Galaxy A50s has slightly more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A50s also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi A3 and Samsung Galaxy A50s feature quite similar batteries, although the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has 4030mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.