Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2019-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha is a bit better than Galaxy A50s, getting a general score of 88.9 against 86.6. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha's construction is a lot heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A50s. These phones use the same Android 10 operating system. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little lower pixel count in each display inch, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2088 x 2250 and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, although it has a lot smaller camera sensor capturing much worse quality videos and pictures, a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with a lot worse 48 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.