Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has a score of 86.6, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's 84.3 general score. These devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has Android 14. Although the Galaxy A50s is much older and notably thicker than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, it's construction is still a lot lighter.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a quite higher pixels density, a larger display and a lot higher resolution of 2224 x 2488px. The Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A50s features a slightly bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A50s, because it has a better resolution back-facing camera, a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture for better images and video in low light situations and a way bigger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.