Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A50s's general score of 86.6. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a better cellphone than the Galaxy A50s, it must be noted that it is also a noticeably heavier and thicker cellphone. Both phones we compare here include the same Android 10 OS.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger screen. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50s. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 6 GB of RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture for better low light photos, a much higher video definition and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. Galaxy A50s has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A50s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has an 18% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.