Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is a little bit better than the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, with a overall score of 86.6 against 79.5. The Galaxy A50s construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has Android 13 version.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a brighter display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a quite bigger display, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy A50s features a slightly better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has a tinier aperture and a back camera with way less mega-pixels.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has better battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.