Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is better than Xiaomi Poco M3, having an 86.6 score against 78.2. The Galaxy A50s design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Poco M3, despite of the fact that it was released around 13 months before. These devices have the same Android 10 operating system. Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A50s has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a little bit higher pixel number in each inch of screen. Galaxy A50s counts with much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has 64 GB more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. Galaxy A50s has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same sensor size and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.