Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, having a global score of 86.6 against 78.2. Galaxy A50s is an older cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, but it's somewhat lighter and much thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison review include the same Android 10 operating system. Galaxy A50s features a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A50s has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a just a bit better pixels count in each screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in low light environments, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera and the same camera sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A50s counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.