Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's 82.4 general score. The Galaxy A50s is an older device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it lighter and a little thinner. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite larger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's CPU is very similar to the CPU in Galaxy A50s, both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has improved battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.