Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy A50s's construction is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, even though it was released just 19 months before.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a sharper screen than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite better pixel quantity in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A50s shoots much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a much worse resolution back camera and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos. The Galaxy A50s counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.