Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, having an 86.6 score against 86.1. Galaxy A50s's construction is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a bit more pixels per screen inch, a better resolution of 2080 x 2400 and a quite larger display. Galaxy A50s has a much better memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 6 GB of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited situations and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with superior battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.