Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-20 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's global score of 77.1. These phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy A50s's design is a little bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a better screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a better 2080 x 2400 resolution, a bit bigger display and a little bit higher pixel amount in each inch of display. Galaxy A50s counts with a much faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. They have a 6 GB RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A50s features slightly more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.