Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, having a score of 86.6 against 83.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has Android 13 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a brighter display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2710 pixels, a bit bigger display and a little bit higher display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has an extremely better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.