Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having an 86.6 score against 76.6. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should give very similar OS features. The Galaxy A50s construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, even though both of them were only released 7 months apart.
Galaxy A50s features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a bit greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50s has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A50s also has 3 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features superior battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 26 percent bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy A50s takes a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same sensor size and a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.