Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's global score of 79. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A50s has older 10 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11. Although Galaxy A50s and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy A50s is noticeably lighter and thinner.
The Galaxy A50s has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and Samsung Galaxy A50s feature incredibly similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and videos, they both have the same video frame rates, the same video quality, a same resolution back facing camera and the same sensor size.
Galaxy A50s features a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with improved battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.