Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-20 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than the ZTE Axon 20, with an 86.6 score against 77.8. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is an older phone than the ZTE Axon 20, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit thinner and lighter anyway.
The Galaxy A50s has a bit more vivid display than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixel density. ZTE Axon 20 counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 20 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The ZTE Axon 20 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same video quality, the ZTE Axon 20 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, faster video frame rate, a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than ZTE Axon 20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The ZTE Axon 20 has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 4220mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.