Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than the Google Pixel 3, having a general score of 90.8 against 80. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 3, although it is noticeably heavier and a little thicker. Google Pixel 3 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Google Pixel 3 features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy A51 5G takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a much larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A51 5G features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.