Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2023-05-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.56 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Coffee Black and Snow White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SM7450-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 644 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is better than HTC U23 Pro, getting a score of 90.8 against 77.8. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and HTC U23 Pro has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is an noticeably older phone than HTC U23 Pro, but it is just a little lighter and just a little thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit sharper screen than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels in each display inch. Galaxy A51 5G features a much better performance than HTC U23 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a greater memory to store more apps and games than HTC U23 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The HTC U23 Pro counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Galaxy A51 5G shoots a lot better photographs and videos than HTC U23 Pro, although it has a much lower 48 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.