Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-29 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is better than the LG G7 Fit's global score of 77. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a newer device than the LG G7 Fit, but it's heavier and a little bit thicker.
Galaxy A51 5G has a little faster processor than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM. The LG G7 Fit has a better looking screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a larger aperture and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
Galaxy A51 5G has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.