Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-29 | 2019-07-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.11 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Mirror black, Mirror teal and Mirror white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3550mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is better than LG G8S ThinQ's 82.5 score. Galaxy A51 5G is a newer cellphone than LG G8S ThinQ, although it is a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version while LG G8S ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG G8S ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a quite smaller display, a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2248px and a quite worse pixel count per inch of display. LG G8S ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a superior camera than LG G8S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and video in low light environments and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The LG G8S ThinQ counts with a greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A51 5G counts with superior battery duration than LG G8S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.