Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the LG K62, getting a global score of 90.8 against 78.2. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version and LG K62 has Android 10. Despite being the best in this review, the Galaxy A51 5G is a just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than the LG K62.
The LG K62 counts with a processor that's just as good as the processor in Galaxy A51 5G, and although the LG K62 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a more vivid screen than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way greater screen pixel density.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a superior camera than LG K62, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting images and videos in low light situations, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor and a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a lot higher video quality.
LG K62 features a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG K62 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better battery performance than LG K62, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.