Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-29 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism cube black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 score. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG V30S ThinQ.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor and a much more MP back-facing camera.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with greater battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.