Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is much better than LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. The Galaxy A51 5G design is newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than LG V35 ThinQ. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A51 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G takes better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and videos and a camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has greater battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 36% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G costs more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.