Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 overall score. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has newer 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features and performance tweaks. Even though Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is newer than the LG V40 ThinQ, it is thicker and just a little bit heavier.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and more pixels per inch of display. The LG V40 ThinQ features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rate and a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much better resolution back camera and a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a slightly better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with superior battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Galaxy A51 5G costs a lot more than LG V40 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.