Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is just a bit better than LG Velvet, getting a 90.8 score against 87.1. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is an a bit heavier and just a bit thicker device than LG Velvet. LG Velvet has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 6 GB of RAM.
LG Velvet features a screen that is just as good as Galaxy A51 5G's screen, because although the LG Velvet has a just a bit worse display density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460. LG Velvet features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A51 5G has a little better battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5% more battery capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G takes just a bit better photos and videos than LG Velvet, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in poorly lited environments, they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the same video frame rates and the same sensor size.
Although Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a better device, it costs more than the LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Velvet. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG Velvet, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.