Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is a bit better than the Motorola edge, with a score of 90.8 against 89.6. Even when Galaxy A51 5G and Motorola edge were only released 1 months apart, Galaxy A51 5G is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 5G has a more recent 11 version and Motorola edge has Android 10.
Motorola edge has a little faster processor than Galaxy A51 5G. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G features a little sharper display than Motorola edge, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little greater pixels count in each inch in the screen.
Motorola edge has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola edge also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video.
The Motorola edge has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB, the Motorola edge also has 128 GB more internal storage. The Motorola edge and Galaxy A51 5G both feature similar battery durations.
Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.