Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, having a score of 92.8 against 90.8. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a newer and just a little thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, but it is a little bit heavier. These devices use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per display inch, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also counts with a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light situations, a lot better video definition and a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A51 5G and the Motorola Edge 20 Pro both have extremely similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.