Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the Motorola Edge (2024), having a 90.8 score against 78.5. Even though the Galaxy A51 5G is better than Motorola Edge (2024), it must be noted that it is also notably older, just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14.
Motorola Edge (2024) has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a quite bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much better camera than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has a worse (4K) video quality, a much tinier back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, a smaller aperture and a back camera with a worse 48 MP resolution. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.