Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a 90.8 score against 78.5. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Despite being the best we are comparing here, Galaxy A51 5G's design is notably older, somewhat heavier and thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of them have a display with the same size, a higher pixels number per inch in the display and the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G has a little longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger camera sensor and a back camera with more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.