Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, having a 90.8 score against 83.1. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it is also a way older, just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier device. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo's CPU is very similar to the processing unit in Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a display that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's display, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A51 5G has much more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 12% larger battery size.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a camera with a lot worse 48 megapixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.