Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 general score. The Galaxy A51 5G construction is just a bit lighter than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, although it's a little bit thicker and was released 2 years before. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit worse display density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a little bit bigger display. Galaxy A51 5G features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments, a way more MP back-facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a little better battery life than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.