Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro's overall score of 83.4. Galaxy A51 5G's body has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, but it is just a bit lighter. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a bit better display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel amount per display inch, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a quite bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes better photos and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels, a larger aperture to capture better low light images and video, a way better video quality and a lot larger sensor. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.