Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's global score of 81.9. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Galaxy A51 5G construction is older, just a bit thicker and a bit heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a bit higher 1256 x 2760 resolution. Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G features a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4310mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a back facing camera with a higher resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.