Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro's score of 86.3. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G body is way older, just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little lower display density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bit larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a back camera with a better resolution, a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a battery performance that is very similar to the battery duration in Samsung Galaxy A51 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.