Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism cube black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 980 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP5 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Galaxy A51 5G's construction has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but it is just a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with a higher 50 MP resolution, faster 60 fps video frame rates, a larger aperture to take better captures in low light environments and a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality photos and videos.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a greater memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's battery lifetime is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.